Grammaticality

It is the insertion of a word into another word. In "a whole nother" the "a" and the "-nother" go together and the "whole" is slotted between them. It is exactly the same process you get with the common, but more vulgar, "Abso-fucking-lutely" or "unbe-fucking-lievable". For a humorous take on the subject: xkcd.

grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jun 20, 2011 at 10:18. RegDwigнt. 96.9k 39 39 gold badges 308 308 silver badges 400 400 bronze badges. asked Jun 20, 2011 at 9:08. Tovi7 Tovi7. 183 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 4 4 bronze badges. 3.grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Oct 21, 2012 at 17:20. StoneyB on hiatus. 68.7k 4 4 gold badges 134 134 silver badges 239 239 bronze badges. asked Oct 14, 2011 at 1:23. JakeParis JakeParis. 223 1 1 gold badge 2 2 silver badges 6 6 bronze badges. 9. 2.grammaticality; expressions; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Aug 30, 2011 at 13:44. ray023. asked Aug 29, 2011 at 5:20. ray023 ray023. 327 1 1 gold badge 4 4 silver badges 12 12 bronze badges. 2. 2. @kiamlaluno What he means is that in most situations, active voice is preferred.In theoretical linguistics, grammaticality is the quality of a linguistic utterance of being grammatically well-formed. An asterisk before a form is a mark ...grammaticality; pronouns; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jan 20, 2021 at 0:04. JEL. 32.6k 4 4 gold badges 66 66 silver badges 108 108 bronze badges. asked Jun 15, 2011 at 21:30. rest_day rest_day. 4,093 8 8 gold badges 32 32 silver badges 39 39 bronze badges. 5. 13.1. Both are correct. You can use either. May and might are used to talk about possible actions or happenings. They mean the same. It doesn't matter whether we use 'may' or 'might'. He may be going to London.= He might be going to London. She may be able to give you some money.= She might be able to give you some money.600 1 5 16. 3. Would you? is generally considered more polite and indirect than will you?. So a parent is more likely to say will you? to a child and would you? to a friend. Thus you might hear Will you be going to the dance? and Would you be able to assist me? - Ronald Sole.2 Answers. That is not the right way to use to no avail. To no avail is an adjunct of result in clause structure with a meaning similar to unsuccessfully, with no result, or fruitlessly. It is pretty much a set phrase that does not permit the addition of other elements. The no may be swapped out for little, much or what depending on the degree ...

2. I agree with your friend. It is redundant to write "discuss about." The definition of "discuss" is "talk about;" so, when you write "discuss about," substituting the definition of "discuss," you're saying "talk about about." Other than redundancy consider this; the 1st use of "about" is an adverb which is how I think you are using it, and as ...Require with an agent subject can take an infinitive complement with B-Raising. That means no for, since that's the mark of an unRaised subject: A has required B to effect a change is grammatical. It can also take an untensed that-complement (what used to be called "the subjunctive"), but in this case the that complementizer cannot be deleted: A has required that B effect a change is OK, but ...131 1 1 5. 2. Not can go before a gerund clause like having given up yet. Your friend probably didn't understand the different rule for gerunds and infinitives. Non-finite clauses like those can be preceded directly by not. Or not can occur after the first auxiliary verb (here, having) in the verb phrase of these subordinate clauses, just as it ...The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. A comprehensive review of the acceptability judgment literature prior to 1996, with topics ranging from the evidential role of acceptability in theories of grammar, to concerns about the reliability of traditionally collected ...Relative (un)grammaticality is an ever-changing property of the stimulus, whereas absolute (un)grammaticality is stable. In both readings of the term, grammaticality is defined by something that is external to the stimulus (be it the grammar of a specific language or principles of general/linguistic cognition), and it is not an inextricable ...I believe over the week-end has a different meaning to at the week-end (or Am on the w/e).It suggests that it is some sort of task or chore which you will deliver on the Monday or thereafter e.g. a piece of homework. One would seldom hear Are you going to the football match over the week-end - in fact it wouldn't make sense. I think over implies sometime over and that the timing is loose.

Sep 28, 2022 · To supplement the grammaticality norms of Luka and Choi with data from our own participant population, we conducted norming with a sample of 40 University of Pittsburgh undergraduates who did not participate in the main experiment. Participants assigned grammaticality ratings to written sentences in a random order. Licensed Download PDF. 389. This book examines a project that investigated ways of measuring implicit/explicit L2 knowledge, the relationship between the two types of knowledge and language proficiency, and the effect that different types of form-focused instruction had on their acquisition.grammaticality; syntactic-analysis; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited May 18, 2018 at 5:42. JJJ. 7,138 18 18 gold badges 38 38 silver badges 58 58 bronze badges. asked Aug 19, 2015 at 13:55. ivanz ivanz. 163 1 1 gold badge 2 2 silver badges 5 5 bronze badges. 2. 2. Yes.grammaticality; articles; definite-articles; time; zero-article; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Aug 23, 2019 at 21:01. john-hen. asked Aug 23, 2019 at 6:28. john-hen john-hen. 522 4 4 silver badges 15 15 bronze badges. 10. 6. This week has only one end, which is the end of this week. It's uniquely specified, because you've anchored ...grammaticality judgment test and a metalinguistic knowledge test (both designed to measure explicit knowledge). The tests were admin-istered prior to the instruction, 1 day after the instruction, and again 2 weeks later. Statistical comparisons of the learners' performance on the posttests showed a clear advantage for explicit feedback over

What is apa style of writing.

Ich hoffe, dabei deine Frage nicht verfälscht zu haben. - Zur Frage: Ich fürchte, dass die Antwort kein einfaches "ja" oder "nein" sein kann, denn: Ja, "dann" kann als erstes Wort verwendet werden. Aber die weitere Satzstellung stimmt nicht, denn Aussagesätze im Deutschen sind V2-Sätze. Das bedeutet, dass das Verb an zweiter Stelle stehen ...13‏/10‏/2022 ... It is unclear whether, how and where large pre-trained language models capture subtle linguistic traits like ambiguity, grammaticality and ...4. As a rule of thumb, use "would" when you are talking about hypothetical situations, and "will" when you are referring to definite possibilities. In your examples, you are mixing the two. Number 1 is the best choice, because the hypothetical is at the beginning of the sentence (i.e., "What will" or "What would"), not the highlighted portion ...How to use . grammaticality in a sentenceIt's the task of looking for mutations to the spike protein with both high grammaticality and high semantic change.and proceeds to show me: Definite article + plural noun: Die Männer = The Men. Yes, that's referring to the Nominative (not the other cases) The second table is about the declination of the definite article / all cases of the plural, and the example: Ich will nicht nur mit den Männern arbeiten. is an example of Dative case.

How can I tell whether constructions like "X of Ys" should be considered singular or plural, given that X is singular but Y is plural? A gaggle of girls boards the train. A gaggle of girls board theJan 8, 2016 · The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35 ( 3 ), 423 – 449. doi: 10.1017/S0272263113000041 CrossRef Google Scholar. Henning, G. ( 1987 ). A guide to language testing: Development, evaluation, research. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House. 15‏/10‏/2021 ... Traditionally, linguists have used a form of grammaticality judgement task to investigate the nature of syntactic struc- tures. Often referred ...All three are acceptable and in use. The form that is selected might vary, depending on what X, Y, and Z are, how the sentence is punctuated, what verb is in the sentence, and what preposition is used (other prepositions could be used, besides for, such as to, by, or on). "In the case of fixed capital, 1973-78 growth rates are close to 1973-76 rates both for total capital input and capital ...Grammaticality: Speaker intuitions about whether a chunk of language is ‘correct’, ‘well-formed’, ‘valid’, or ‘understandable’ in their language Prescriptively Ungrammatical : A judgment that a chunk of language is ‘wrong’ or ‘incorrect’ on the basis of social, societal, contextual, or academic ‘rules’. Grammaticality judgments represent one of the earliest forms of data elicitation in L2 research, in large part, due to the early dependence of the field on linguistically-focused research where understanding grammars of the world’s languages was often determined by asking speakers of those languages whether specific sentences are acceptable ... Abstract. Ever since Pereira (2000) provided evidence against Chomsky’s (1957) conjecture that statistical language modelling is incommensurable with the aims of grammaticality prediction as a research enterprise, a new area of research has emerged that regards statistical language models as “psycholinguistic subjects” and probes their ...Forgive me for not being able to be there at your birthday party. I apologies for not being able to attend your birthday party. Unfortunately, I couldn't celebrate your birthday with you. I'm sorry. I'm deeply sorry that I couldn't come to your birthday. I'm so sorry that I couldn't join the birthday party.As per comments, OP's concepts of "right/correct" aren't helpful here. Lots of prepositions are valid, depending on context. Here are some estimates from Google Books for he walked xxxx the road... down:18100 along:15400 up:8020 on:7700 across:5710 into:663 over:437 in:5. I immediately recognise a problem with those figures - as a native speaker, I know perfectly well that on, for example, isn ...Acceptability judgments present a serious problem for both classical binary and probabilistic theories of grammaticality. These judgements are gradient in nature, and so cannot be directly accommodated in a binary formal grammar. However, it is also not possible to simply reduce acceptability to probability.Jan 8, 2016 · The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35 ( 3 ), 423 – 449. doi: 10.1017/S0272263113000041 CrossRef Google Scholar. Henning, G. ( 1987 ). A guide to language testing: Development, evaluation, research. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.

As per comments, OP's concepts of "right/correct" aren't helpful here. Lots of prepositions are valid, depending on context. Here are some estimates from Google Books for he walked xxxx the road... down:18100 along:15400 up:8020 on:7700 across:5710 into:663 over:437 in:5. I immediately recognise a problem with those figures - as a native speaker, I know perfectly well that on, for example, isn ...

In short, prefixes with a hypen, e.g. "pre-" should be avoided unless it will not be clear to the reader what the word is. This is even more the case if there is an existing word so, in your case, "pre-requisite" should not be used. Interconnection -- not Inter-connection; Pre-workout -- not Preworkout. Prerequisite -- not Pre-requisite.+1 because even though technically speaking both @Robusto and @Martha are right on the grammaticality issue, you're far more right in terms of what it would be more desirable to actually say. - FumbleFingers. Jun 16, 2011 at 17:34See Full PDFDownload PDF. Grammaticality and Acceptability (Grammar Correct and Incorrect - Grammar and Usage) There is a view that grammar can be good or bad, correct or in correct. This is based on the misconception that grammar is a set of normative rules that tell us how a language should be used. Traditional grammarians would insist that ...In general, I think people use "two times more likely" to mean the same thing as "two times as likely" and "twice as likely," but I believe I've encountered a peeve where people object to this use of "two times more likely" and say that it "logically" should mean "three times as likely" (because one plus two is three).Yes, many thanks is perfectly proper, grammatical, standard English. It is appropriate to use wherever "thanks" (as opposed to "thank you") would be acceptable. As Martha says, many thanks is perfectly idiomatic. However, it is indeed an oddly isolated idiom: most other constructions which try to treat thanks as a plural noun are ungrammatical ...1 Answer. Sorted by: 14. Both sentences are possible. Zustimmung und Ablehnung ist sehr wichtig. Zustimmung und Ablehnung sind sehr wichtig. In the first sentence, " Zustimmung and Ablehnung " are regarded as a unit. This is known as 'synesis' in linguistics. In the second sentence, they are viewed separately.In general, I think people use "two times more likely" to mean the same thing as "two times as likely" and "twice as likely," but I believe I've encountered a peeve where people object to this use of "two times more likely" and say that it "logically" should mean "three times as likely" (because one plus two is three).Grammaticality should not be confused with notions of correctness or acceptability as determined by prescriptive grammarians."Grammaticality is a theoretical term," says Frederick J. Newmeyer: "a sentence is 'grammatical' if it is generated by the grammar, 'ungrammatical' if it is not" (Grammatical Theory: Its Limits and Its Possibilities, 1983).

Kansas state rock.

Affine space.

The use of prepositions after need seems to have changed greatly over the last 200 years. Consider the following Google Ngram. Before 1800, the noun need took the preposition of, over half of its uses occurred in the expression in need of, and it did not take an article.When it then started being more widely used as a noun in the mid-1800s, it started taking an article, but at first it still ...Abstract. Grammaticality judgments reflect a compound product of both grammatical and processing factors. But because they interact in a symbiotic way, very often grammatical and processing constraints are difficult to separate.In your case, involved in is more suitable, and if you need to use with (maybe to prevent repetition within the paragraph), the correct verb would be associated as in "They are all associated with the program". "associated" with a project is very different than "involved" with a project. realistically, yes, its different.Jan 17, 2013 at 14:14. 1. But @BillFranke the OP is asking whether the second line can be used at all ("The people (of which there are many, many)"). My answer is no, it can't, but I couldn't tell you why. Good question. - JAM. Jan 17, 2013 at 14:51. 1. @JAM: Sure the second line can be used in colloquial English.You're varying two things: 1. whether you put the phrase in commas; and 2. whether you insert the word "as". So really, there are four possibilities here: +commas +as, +commas -as, -commas +as, -commas -as. I'm going to insert the other two possibilities into your question.1 Answer. Will that be alright for you? Here, the speaker wants to know whether something is suitable for you. Will that be alright with you? Here, the speaker wants to know whether you agree with the speaker. Is 'alright' considered acceptable now? Still a bit iffy, in formal writing.This paper provides a critical review of the state of the art in code-switching research being conducted in linguistics. Three issues of theoretical and practical importance are explored: (a) code-switching vs. borrowing; (b) grammaticality; and (c) variability vs. uniformity, and I take a position on all three issues. Regarding switching vs. …Thus conceived, speaker–hearers are portrayed as individuals who possess linguistic knowledge and can provide judgments concerning the grammaticality of certain sentences Footnote 2 while it is generative linguists’ task to work out the system of rules that ‘expresses his [a native speaker’s] knowledge of his language’ Footnote 3 ...@KitΘδς: this really doesn't seem like a duplicate to me; it actually seems a lot more interesting and on-topic than the old question. That asks for whole sentences composed of repeated words — which are a cute puzzle, but rather contrived and little to do with actual usage. This question just asks about words that can be repeated once consecutively within a sentence — and as answers ... ….

In that case, "solution" is the noun form of "solve". There's no need to take a noun derived from a verb and then derive yet another verb from that noun. You say "We are working on solving the problem", NOT "We are working on solutioning the problem." If by "solution" you mean a solid mixed into a liquid, then the verb is "dissolve".In language, a rule is a regulation or instruction that describes the way things are or should be. It is a statement of observed regularity in language use, a grammatical principle that describes the ways in which words, phrases, and sentences in a language can be used.Grammars that are concerned with rules may be prescriptive or descriptive, with differences in approach.Mar 7, 2019 · Judgment tasks (JTs, often called acceptability or grammaticality judgment tasks) are found extensively throughout the history of second language (L2) research. Data from such instruments have been used to investigate a range of hypotheses and phenomena, from generativist theories to instructional effectiveness. Grammaticality judgments are a very popular task in attrition research. This chapter will look at different ways in which these tasks can be set up and used. …A fair few of those are by obviously non-native writers, and many of the ones that aren't seem to be the result of mixing up falling asleep and getting to sleep.There are only a few of them that really seem like they deliberately wrote falling to sleep.And even with all the non-natives and mixer-uppers, there are still about 300 times as many instances of fall(ing)/fell asleep as fall(ing ...In short, prefixes with a hypen, e.g. "pre-" should be avoided unless it will not be clear to the reader what the word is. This is even more the case if there is an existing word so, in your case, "pre-requisite" should not be used. Interconnection -- not Inter-connection; Pre-workout -- not Preworkout. Prerequisite -- not Pre-requisite.grammaticality; verbs; prepositions; transitivity; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Mar 11, 2017 at 9:22. Glorfindel. 14.5k 15 15 gold badges 66 66 silver badges 59 59 bronze badges. asked Oct 7, 2011 at 0:53. camdez camdez. 141 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 4 4 bronze badges. 2. 1.Acceptability judgments present a serious problem for both classical binary and probabilistic theories of grammaticality. These judgements are gradient in nature, and so cannot be directly accommodated in a binary formal grammar. However, it is also not possible to simply reduce acceptability to probability. Grammaticality, [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1]